GM Food Campaign is Now Million Dollar Fight
Aug 24, 2012 07:26 AM EDT | By Sharon Robinson
When one million Californians signed a petition for proposition 37 to be put up for a state-wide vote, nobody thought that a war of sorts would begin between the supporters of prop 37 and non-supporters.
Like Us on Facebook
Over the past few weeks, millions of dollars have been poured into the campaign. "California Right to Know," the group that supports labeling of GM food, has raised around $3 million. On the other hand, thanks to the support of many big-food corps and agri-businesses, "No on 37" has raised over $25 million. Last week alone, "No on 37" received donations equalling $13 million.
The largest contribution, of $4.2 million, to the non-labeling campaign has been made by Monsanto Co., the most infamous biotechnology giant, known for its aggressive GM food marketing. Other notable food corps includes Coca Cola, Pepsi Co., Kellogg and Nestle USA.
Both the coalitions expect this to turn into a media battle, where the one with the best "infomercials" will win.
The campaign revealed that even those companies claiming to have "all-natural" food products support the campaign against labeling, and have gone so far as to contribute thousands of dollars towards it. For instance, Silk soy milk, which has a "Non-GMO Project Verified" seal, is owned by Dean Foods, which has put in more than $250,000, into the "No on 37" campaign, reports Huffington Post.
Recent polls revealed that prop 37 is likely to win 3:1, regardless of the funds raised by the opposition, reports the San Francisco Chronicle.
The wants of the supporters of prop 37 seems pretty straight forward. They want to know if the food they eat every day is genetically modified or not. They fear that GM food increases the risk of allergies.
The non-supporters, on the other hand, claim that they support "No on 37" because food prices are likely to increase if food products are labelled. Moreover, people are less likely to buy food with GM products, leading to a drop in sales.
Some blogs, including Farm Press, are going so far as calling prop 37 "anti-science." A blog post in Farm Press by Harry Cline, compares prop 37 to prop 215, which made medical marijuana legal in California.
The FDA, too, does not seem to be very supportive of prop 37. So far, it has maintained the stance that since no medical issues have arisen because of GM food, there is no reason to label GM food.
Come Nov. 6, the result of the fight between the two camps will be revealed. If prop 37 is passed, other states are likely to follow the example of California.
In a bold move, last week the coffee giant released a new campaign, Starbucks’ Race Together, in which baristas in United States venues were invited to start a conversation with clients about race in America – but it’s been a marketing disaster all the way through.
California Wines: 31 Brands Of Cheap California Wines Loaded With Very High Levels of Toxic Arsenic?
California wines- Are you addicted to California wines? Wait until you read this! Some cheap California wines were found positive for inorganic arsenic that is believed to be lethal beyond allowable limits.
The Minnesota-based company is turning 75 today, and they’re celebrating along with fans with a Free Cone Day, as Dairy Queen’s vanilla ice cream makes a full appearance all over the country, as the company also teams up with a big charity for the occasion.
Just today, February 25, 2015, Yahoo! Food posts the secret weapon ingredients used by Star Chefs to achieve the most palatable dishes at home or in a restaurant. The said website revealed the top 10 magical ingredients that can turn home-cooked meals into top class restaurant tastes.
For those who love to have a nice glass of wine or beer during the weekends - which is just about everyone or almost -, there's a new way to keep the guessing out of the way you choose what to drink: the Next Glass app chooses drinks according to what you love!
U.S. Consumers, Ready To Accept Genetically Modified, Nanotech Products If It Is Healthy And Safe, New Survey Reveals
A national survey done by the North Carolina State University and the University of Minnesota representatives suggests that most U.S. consumers are ready to accept genetically modified and nanotech products if it is enhanced with nutrition and are safe.